Martinez

(PC) Medina v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20241:23-cv-00935California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MEDINA, JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-00935-KES-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

12 GUSTAVO MARTINEZ, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Plaintiff Robert Medina, Jr. was confined in Fresno County Jail (FCJ) at the time the events giving rise to this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis on his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants J. Alvarez, Gustavo Martinez, and First-Name-Unknown (FNU) Martinez. Only Defendant Alvarez was served and answered Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 37). On November 13, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements within 30 days. (ECF No. 41). Defendant Alvarez filed his statement. (ECF No. 44). Plaintiff did not file his, and the time to do so has passed. The Court has reviewed this case and Defendant Alvarez’s statement. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.