Ricolcol

Nidal Awawdah v. Ricolcol

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20242:24-cv-08633California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-08633-MRA-AJR Date: December 26, 2024 Page 1 of

Title: Nidal Awawdah v. Warden Ricolcol

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On October 3, 2024, pro se Petitioner Nidal Awawdah (“Petitioner), an inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at FCI Victorville Med I, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) In the Petition, Petitioner sought a court order directing the BOP to grant her 14 months of jail credit under the First Step Act and Second Chance Act. (Id. at 3.) Petitioner alleged that with this additional credit awarded, she would be entitled to immediate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.