Stiner

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20244:17-cv-03962California1,756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AS TO THE

BROOKHURST SUBCLASS’ ACCESS

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et BARRIER CLAIMS al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 856, 984, 985 Defendants. 12 In its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”), the Court deferred ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ access barrier claims. Dkt. No. 978; Stacia Stiner, et al., v. Brookdale Senior Living Inc., et al., No. 17-CV-03962-HSG, 2024 WL 5112480 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2024). The Court now addresses those claims, and for the reasons discussed below DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to the Brookhurst subclass’ access barrier claims. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The substance and nature of the relief that Plaintiffs sought at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.