Leonardo Sanchez v. Merriam E. Spearman
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20248:19-cv-01930California1,025 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LEONARDO SANCHEZ, Case No. 8:19-cv-01930-MCS-AGR
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART
v. AND REJECTING IN PART
FINDINGS AND
PATRICK COVELLO, RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
Respondent. JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition, (SAP, ECF No. 33), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Report, ECF No. 46), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, (Objs., ECF No. 48). The Court also considered oral argument presented by the parties at a hearing on September 16, 2024. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts in part and rejects in part the findings …