Leonardo Sanchez v. Merriam E. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20248:19-cv-01930California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARDO SANCHEZ, Case No. 8:19-cv-01930-MCS-AGR

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART

v. AND REJECTING IN PART

FINDINGS AND

PATRICK COVELLO, RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Respondent. JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition, (SAP, ECF No. 33), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Report, ECF No. 46), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, (Objs., ECF No. 48). The Court also considered oral argument presented by the parties at a hearing on September 16, 2024. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts in part and rejects in part the findings …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.