(PC) Parker v. N. West

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20242:22-cv-02015California896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN PARKER, No. 2:22-cv-2015 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER N.WEST, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On December 9, 2024, nonparty Durrell Puckett filed a document styled “Summary Judgment and Settlement Agreed Statement.” (ECF No. 62.) Mr. Puckett signed the filing in at least two places. (Id. at 2, 3.) Mr. Puckett is not a party to this action and cannot file documents on behalf of fellow inmates. In addition, Mr. Puckett cannot represent a fellow prisoner. See Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997) (“While a non-attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf, he has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself”) (internal quotations and citation omitted); see also Jorss v. Schwarzenegger, 168 F. App’x 825, 826 (9th Cir. 2006) (finding the district court properly dismissed the complaint because the pro se prisoner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.