(PC)Arteaga

(PC)Arteaga v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20241:22-cv-01292California951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE O. ARTEAGA, Case No. 1:22-cv-01292-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 14) J. GARCIA, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Jose O. Arteaga is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 The assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and gave leave for plaintiff 21 to either file a First Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies identified by the court or stand 22 on his complaint. Doc. 8. Among other deficiencies, the screening order noted that plaintiff’s 23 171-page complaint improperly asserted unrelated claims in the same action. Id. Plaintiff 24 thereafter filed a notice stating that he wished to stand on his complaint. Doc. 11. 25 The magistrate judge subsequently issued findings and recommendations on October 11, 26 2023, recommending that plaintiff’s complaint proceed on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims 27 against defendants J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.