Pfeiffer

(PC) Estrada v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20241:23-cv-00769California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME IGNACIO ESTRADA, No. 1:23-cv-00769-KES-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Docs. 14, 15) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jamie Ignacio Estrada, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied as premature because defendants had not yet been served and the court had not yet obtained personal jurisdiction over the defendants. Doc. 14 at 2. The magistrate judge also recommended that plaintiff’s motion for class certification be denied. Id. at 3 (citing McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966). Plaintiff was notified that any objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.