Caasi

(PC) Tillett v. Caasi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20241:24-cv-00849California742 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LLOYD R. TILLETT, Case No. 1:24-cv-00849-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE v. AND DANIEL JAMES CAASI, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

Defendant. SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 16 Plaintiff Lloyd R. Tillett is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and allowed at least one claim to proceed past screening. (ECF No. 9). The sole defendant, Daniel James Caasi, has appeared and filed an Answer. (ECF No. 16). In addition, 20 “[a]fter investigating the claims and speaking with Plaintiff,” Defendants filed a notice (ECF No. 21 18) that they “do not believe that a settlement conference would be productive at this time.” (Id. 22 at 1). Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference at this time and will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.