Kilgore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KURT KAYWOOD, No. 2:24-cv-00931-DJC-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID KILGORE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon the screening of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, this action should be dismissed without further leave to amend. I. Background and Procedural History On September 18, 2024, this Court screened the complaint per the screening process required by the IFP statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and concluded the complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, failed to plead a sufficient basis for jurisdiction, and failed to state a claim. ECF No. 4. The screening order further set forth that if Plaintiff was attempting to challenge a state court award of child support, this Court would lack jurisdiction to review…