HydraFacial LLC v. eMIRAmed USA LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20248:24-cv-01865California491 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 24-01865-FWS (ADSx) Date December 27, 2024
Title HydraFacial LLC et al v. eMIRAmed USA LLC et al
Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Melissa H. Kunig Not Reported
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
“[I]t is the plaintiff’s responsibility to move a case toward a merits disposition.” Thomas v. Kernan, 2019 WL 8888200, at *1 (C.D. Cal. July 10, 2019) (citing Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)). That includes, where applicable, promptly (a) filing stipulations extending a defendant’s time to respond to the complaint, (b) pursuing default and remedies under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 when a defendant fails to timely respond to the complaint, or (c) dismissing a case the plaintiff has chosen not to pursue for any reason.