Mack White v. BP Products North America Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20245:24-cv-01827California3,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MACK WHITE, on behalf of himself, all Case No. 5:24-cv-01827-SPG-SK 11 other similarly situated, and the general ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S public, MOTION TO REMAND AND Plaintiff, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS [ECF NOS. 11, 20]

v.

BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA,

INC., a Maryland Corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is the motion to remand (ECF No. 11 (“Motion”)) filed by the Plaintiff Mack White (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and considered the Motion and concluded that it is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS the case be remanded to the Riverside County Superior Court. Further, given this ruling, the Court denies Defendant’s separately filed motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.