Roe AH 71 v. Doe 1
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROE AH 71, ) Case No. CV 24-9544 FMO (JCx) Plaintiff, V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION 14| 1E, etal., Defendants.
On August 23, 2024, plaintiff Jane Roe (“plaintiff’), filed a complaint in Ventura County Superior Court (“state court”) against defendants Does 1 through 3, (see Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal 19|| (“NOR’) at 2), asserting state law claims for: (1) negligence; (2) negligent supervision of a minor; 20 || (3) sexual abuse of a minor; (4) negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; (5) negligent failure to warn, train, or educate; and (6) breach of mandatory duty. (See Dkt. 1-1, Complaint at J] 57- 22 || 99). On November 4, 2024, defendants Does and (collectively, “the removing defendants”) 23 || removed the action to this court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (See Dkt. 24] 1, NOR at J 3). …