Corrine Thomas v. County of Humboldt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 202423-15847California3,455 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CORRINE MORGAN THOMAS; et al., No. 23-15847

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-05725-RMI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, California; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

VIRGINA BASS, Chair, Board of Supervisors,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Robert M. Illman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. This putative class action arises out of Humboldt County’s system of

penalties and fees involving cannabis abatement. Plaintiffs—residents of

Humboldt County—filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a number…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.