People v. Anderson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2024C099751California3,407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 12/30/24 P. v. Anderson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099751

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22FE013202)

v.

RASHAWN MAURICE ANDERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

After a jury found defendant Rashawn Maurice Anderson guilty of first degree murder and unlawful possession of a firearm, the trial court sentenced him to prison for 50 years to life plus three years. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence the killing was premeditated and deliberate; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise certain mitigating circumstances and legal arguments at sentencing; and (3) the trial court erred by not staying the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.