Leeper

Leeper v. Shipt, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2024B339670California3,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

A. The Arbitration Agreement Between Leeper and Appellants Shipt is an online ordering platform whose members arrange for Shipt “[s]hoppers” to purchase and provide delivery of goods from local merchants. On March 19, 2019, Leeper entered into an independent contractor agreement with Shipt to provide services as a Shipt shopper. The independent contractor

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to the Labor Code. 2 See pages 6–7, post, regarding our use of the terminology “individual PAGA claim” and “representative PAGA claim.”

2 agreement references and incorporates a separate arbitration agreement Leeper and Shipt also executed. The arbitration agreement obligates Leeper and appellants3 to “resolve[ ] through mandatory, binding arbitration” “any and all disputes, claims, or controversies of any kind and nature between [them].” The arbitration agreement also delegates to the arbitrator several threshold issues, including “disputes about whether any claims, controversies, or disputes between us are subject to arbitration” and “claims . . . regarding the scope, interpretation, validity, and enforceability of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.