Newsom

(PC) Roberts v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20241:21-cv-00506California1,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ROBERTS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00506-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF

PARTIES

v. (Doc. 42) GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Clerk of the Court to Terminate a Defendant Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Paul Roberts is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Following screening of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, this action proceeds on the following claims: (a) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants CIM Warden, Delgadillo, and Gilman (claim one); (b) Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants CIM Warden, Delgadillo, Farooq, Gilman, Lemus, and Torres (claim two); (c) Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants Gonzales and Pilkerton (claim three); (d) an equal protection violation against Defendant Pilkerton (claim three); (e) a due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.