Ramirez

Ramirez v. Swift

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20243:24-cv-05974California299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ, Case No. 24-cv-05974-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT &

v.

RECOMMENDATION

TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Elias Ramirez alleges that he is married to pop music icon Taylor Swift. He contends that Swift and other individuals, such as football player Travis Kelce, have violated his and Swift’s “Sacred Relationship.” See Compl. (dkt. 1) He seeks “immediate reunification” with Swift, that “certain [individuals] be put to death,” and control of Swift’s assets. Id. at 3–4, 8. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim recommended that Ramirez’s Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). R&R (dkt. 15) at 2; see also Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989). Ramirez did not object to the recommendation. The Court has reviewed his Complaint and adopts Judge Kim’s R&R in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.