Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. FEIT Electric Co., Inc.

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 SEOUL VIOSYS CO. LTD., Case № 2:24-cv-04238-ODW (AJRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

14 FEIT ELECTRIC CO., INC., MOTION TO DISMISS [27]

15 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Feit Electric Co., Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss 19 Plaintiff Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd.’s willful patent infringement claims for failure to state 20 a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss 21 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 27.) The motion is fully briefed. (Opp’n, ECF 22 No. 40; Reply, ECF No. 41.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART 23 and DENIES IN PART the Motion.1 24 25 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. BACKGROUND2 Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd. (“Seoul…