Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 111) BARAONA, T. CAMPBELL, HERNANDEZ and WHITE, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s opposition to court order denying acceptance of fourth amended complaint, filed on December 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 111, “Motion”). The Court construes the Motion as a motion for reconsideration brought under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a party to move a court to alter or amend its judgment. “A district court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion if it ‘is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.’” Wood v. Ryan, 759 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc)) (emphasis in original). …