Mirto

Mirto v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20245:23-cv-03198California1,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

JOSEPH MIRTO, CASE NO. 23-cv-03198-SVK Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING v. PLAINTIFF’s MOTION FOR APPROVAL CAROLYN COLVIN, OF ATTORNEY FEES Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant 11 After Plaintiff Joseph Mirto brought this action for review of the Commissioner of Social 13 Security’s decision to deny benefits, the Court remanded the case, and the Commissioner issued a 14 favorable decision. His attorney, Katherine Siegfried, now seeks $9,621.42 in attorney fees under 15 section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), as incorporated into the Supplemental 16 Security Income program through 42 U.S.C. §1383(d). ECF No. 24. ECF No. 36. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion. 19 I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 21 After Mr. Mirto applied for disability benefits, his application was denied initially, at 22 reconsideration, after an initial administrative hearing, and at the Appeals Council. (AR 1). This action 23 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.