(PC) Younger v. Officer Alvarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDI ADRIENNE YOUNGER, No. 1:24-cv-00098-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Doc. 11 ALVAREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 7, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s initial complaint, 21 Doc. 1, and determined that plaintiff failed to state a claim against defendant Arreola regarding 22 the conditions of her1 confinement and that this action should proceed only on plaintiff’s failure 23 to protect claim against defendants Alvarez, Gonzales, and Harris. Doc. 9. The magistrate judge 24 concluded that the conditions plaintiff endured of being handcuffed outside for approximately 11 25 hours, well in excess of CDCR’s policy not to handcuff inmates for more than 4 hours, were…