Edward Younghoon Shin v. Tristan Lemon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20248:22-cv-01850California1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 EDWARD YOUNGHOON SHIN, ) Case No. 8:22-cv-01850-CAS-DFM ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS ) ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 13 v. ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE ) ) JUDGE STEVE SMITH, Acting Warden, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (dkt. 1), the Proposed First Amended Petition (dkt. 15-2, “PFAP”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (dkt. 20, the “Report”), and the Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (dkt. 23, the “Objections” or “Obj.”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections 27 have been stated. Having completed its review, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.