(PS) Boudousquie v. US Department of the Army
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LOUIS JOSEPH BOUDOUSQUIE, No. 2:23-cv-00948-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (ECF No. 16) was submitted without oral argument after full briefing (ECF Nos. 20, 21, & 22). The undersigned now recommends that the Motion be granted. I. Procedural History and Background Plaintiff filed this action on May 22, 2023. ECF No. 1. The complaint alleges that Defendant U.S. Department of the Army/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (hereafter “Defendant” or “Army”) engaged in “prohibited personnel practices” including sexual harassment and his removal from employment. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff asserts as the basis for federal jurisdiction the Federal Tort Claims Act. Id. The complaint does not…