(PC) Zulu v. Mule Creek Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20242:24-cv-01892California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAJESTIC ZULU, No. 2:24-cv-01892-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

MULE CREEK PRISONS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison, opened this case with a one-page document styled as “Injunctive Relief request” requesting damages and injunctive relief. (ECF No. 1.) On July 30, 2024, the court informed plaintiff that in order to commence an action, plaintiff must file a complaint as required by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and must either pay the required filing fee or be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court also informed plaintiff that the court will not issue any orders granting or denying relief until an action has been properly commenced. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief was denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court provided plaintiff with copies of the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.