(PS) Babbitt v. Sacramento County Dept. of Child Support Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JOSEPH BABBITT, Case No. 2:24-cv-2397-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT

SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 17 18 On October 30, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 19 recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice 20 that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 24 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 25 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 26 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 28 analysis. 2…