Jose Tallara, Jr. v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 31, 202420-70424California572 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 31 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE SALONGA TALLARA, JR., No. 20-70424 Agency No. A096-616-105 Petitioner,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND,

Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Salonga Tallara (“Tallara”) seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming a decision by an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion.

See, e.g., Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.