Jose Tallara, Jr. v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 31 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE SALONGA TALLARA, JR., No. 20-70424 Agency No. A096-616-105 Petitioner,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND,
Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Jose Salonga Tallara (“Tallara”) seeks review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming a decision by an Immigration
Judge (“IJ”) denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion.