Hable

Hable v. Godenzi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 31, 202424-646California2,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 31 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK HABLE, No. 24-646 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-02012-GMN-BNW v.

MEMORANDUM*

BENN GODENZI,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BENNETT, BRESS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BRESS.

Appellant Patrick Hable appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his

federal and state securities fraud claims against Appellee Benn Godenzi. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

“We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd., 551 F.3d 1156, 1161

(9th Cir. 2009). We accept all well-pleaded allegations as true. Lloyd…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.