People v. Williams-Hull CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 2024C099934California1,845 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/31/24 P. v. Williams-Hull CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099934

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.

STKCRFE20210009839)

v.

GYNNA WILLIAMS-HULL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Gynna Williams-Hull asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will remand the matter for the trial court to calculate and award presentence custody credit and otherwise affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In July 2021, when defendant was 19 years old, she drove a companion to the victim’s location, so the companion could shoot the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.