Teng

Teng v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 2024B337799California2,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kim, J.

Filed 12/31/24 Teng v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

MI PING TENG, B337799

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23AHCV01554) v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,

N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William A. Crowfoot, Judge. Affirmed. Mi Ping Teng, in propria persona, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Parker Ibrahim & Berg, John M. Sorich, and Matthew S. Henderson for Defendant and Respondent. __________________________________ In July 2019, respondent JPMorgan Chase Bank foreclosed on real property (the Property) owned by appellant Mi Ping Teng, after Teng apparently defaulted on a home equity line of credit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.