Valeriya Nedeva-Alaniz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202519-71897California596 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-71897

VALERIYA GEORGIEVA NEDEVA-

ALANIZ,

Agency No. A089-347-529 Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Valeriya Georgieva Nedeva-Alaniz, a citizen of Bulgaria, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or the “Board”)

denying her motion to reopen. Petitioner requests that the Court remand the case

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to the BIA to clarify its decision not to exercise sua sponte authority to reopen

Petitioner’s removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

For a person to obtain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.