Manibusan

United States v. Manibusan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202524-2228California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2228 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:23-cr-00004-JCC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JACOB VANCE MANIBUSAN, AKA

Kadi,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the District Court of Guam John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Jacob Vance Manibusan appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B)(viii), and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

Manibusan contends that the district court procedurally erred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.