S. K. M. v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202523-2366California1,966 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
S. K. M., Nos. 22-50; 23-2366 Agency No. Petitioner, A096-704-824 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: BEA, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner S.K.M., a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of two
decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which (1) affirmed the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of S.K.M.’s claims for withholding of removal and
protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) based on an adverse
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). credibility finding; and (2) denied S.K.M.’s motion to reopen to seek…