Schneider

Schneider v. Lane

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 2025C097818MCalifornia15,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/2/25 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

EBERHARD SCHNEIDER et al., C097818

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 19CV0090)

v. ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

KARLA S. LANE, REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN Defendant and Appellant. JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed in this matter on December 2, 2024, be modified as follows: 1. On page 8 of the opinion, the paragraph beginning with the sentence “The trial court determined the easement’s location” is modified to read as follows in its entirety: The trial court determined the easement’s location. Lane had proposed three alternative routes, each of which were progressively further inland from the permissive route and progressively generated more severe impacts on the

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.