Hearn
Hearn v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA William HEARN, Case No.: 22-cv-0255-AGS-DDL Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
v.
GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO
WARDEN, et al., DISMISS (ECF 77) WITHOUT
LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendants. On December 11, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, urging this Court to grant in part defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend and giving plaintiff William Hearn until December 20, 2024, to object. (See ECF 99, at 17.) To date, Hearn has not objected. The district judge “must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)). Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the Court finds it well-reasoned and without any clear error. So, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s recommendation: 1. Defendants’ motion…