Soto
Soto v. EVO Transportation & Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JUAN SOTO, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02415-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
EVO TRANSPORTATION & SERVICES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 12 Defendants. 13 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Juan Soto and Antonio Arango’s motion to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). ECF No. 25. Defendants EVO Transportation & Services, Inc. and EVO Services Group, LLC (collectively, “EVO”) did not file a response. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 16, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Juan Soto In or about August 2019, Soto was hired as a truckdriver by Thunder Ridge Transport. First Am. Compl. ¶ 4, ECF No.…