Bradley

Bradley v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20253:24-cv-01216California3,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEFAN BRADLEY, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01216-CAB-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF No. 7] Defendants. 16 On July 16, 2024, Plaintiff Stefan Bradley sued Defendants City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department Officer Doe under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegedly violating his right to freedom of movement, right to freedom from unreasonable seizure, and right to be free from the use of excessive force, all purportedly arising under the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, Plaintiff brings state law claims for negligence, assault, battery, and violation of California’s Bane Act. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the four state law causes of action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). [ECF No. 7.] At this juncture, Defendants have not challenged Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim. The Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.