(PC) Magana v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20251:23-cv-00561California2,247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN MAGANA, No. 1:23-cv-00561 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to file an amended complaint. He will be given thirty days to do so. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.