Jay Stevens v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20242:24-cv-06054California5,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAY STEVENS, BRIANA ORTEGA, CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-06054-DSF-JC

ELIJAH ORTEGA, MARIAH ORTEGA,

and MARISSA ORTEGA, [Assigned to: Hon. Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge; Plaintiffs, Hon. Jacqueline Chooljian, United States Magistrate Judge] vs. [DISCOVERY MATTER] 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, municipal STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER entity; ADAM NELSON, an individual, SHAWN MERRICK, an individual, [CHANGES MADE BY COURT JUSTIN MASRI, an individual; TO PARAGRAPHS 2.1, 3, 8, 9] RICHARD MENDOZA, an individual; DOES 1-10 inclusive,

Defendants.

19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.