22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T496,3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS CASE NO: 10 SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 2:24−cv−09341−FMO−JPR FAL−60000091 11 Plaintiff(s), ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 FRACHT FWO LOGISTICS CO., LTD. , et al. 14 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 19 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27 Dated The 2nd of January 2025 /s/24:T4c5,

3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS CASE NO:

10 SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 2:24−cv−09341−FMO−JPR

FAL−60000091

11 Plaintiff(s),

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

12 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 FRACHT FWO LOGISTICS CO., LTD. , et al. 14 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 19 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27 Dated The 2nd of January 2025 /s/