Angela Tisdale v. Apria Healthcare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20252:24-cv-09620California1,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

This is a class action brought under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 382. FAC, Dkt. No. 1-7, 4 1. Plaintiffs allege violations of various state labor codes, the California Unfair Competition law (the “UCL”), Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq., and civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Jd. § 7. Plaintiffs initiated this proceeding in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 24STCV16583. See generally id.

1 The Court does not address Defendant’s objections to the Declaration of B. Hefelfinger because consideration of the declaration does not affect the ruling herein. Page 1 of CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk YS

Plaintiffs contend that they “commenced this case as a ‘follow on’ class action to the Quintero v. Apria Healthcare LLC matter.” Mot. To Remand at 1. The Quintero case has been ongoing in the Los Angeles County Superior Court (Case No. 20STCV42367) since November 3, 2020. Id. at 2. On September 25, 2024, the parties in Quintero participated in a mediation and, as of the time this Motion was filed, were “presently working toward preliminary approval…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.