Doerer
(PC) Lanier v. Doerer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM LANIER, No. 1:24-cv-01178 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT
v. BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY
COURT ORDERS
J. DOERER, (See ECF Nos. 2, 6) Defendant.
PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE, OR IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, HIS RESPONSE TO
COURT ORDER DUE IN THIRTY DAYS
18 Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis, and he appears to have filed this civil rights action to seek relief under 42 U.S.C. § 20 1983. See ECF Nos. 1, 5 (complaint; in forma pauperis application, respectively). The matter 21 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 22 Rule 302. 23 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this matter 24 should not be dismissed for failure to obey court orders. In the alternative, Plaintiff may file a 25 signed…