Samuel Verdin v. Kathleen Alison

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20245:22-cv-00597California1,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 SAMUEL VERDIN, Case No. ED CV 22-00597-DMG Plaintiff, (SSC) v.

ORDER ACCEPTING

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

Defendants.

UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff Samuel Verdin’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. In this prisoner civil rights action, the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends dismissal of Plaintiff’s third amended complaint with leave to amend only an Eighth Amendment claim for delayed and/or inadequate medical care. [Doc. # 32.] Plaintiff’s objections to the Report [Doc. # 35] do not warrant a change Plaintiff objects that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.