Mayes

(PC) Vaden v. Mayes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20252:19-cv-02216California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE VADEN, No. 2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. ROBERT L. MAYES, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 28, 2023, although discovery was closed, the court granted plaintiff leave to file motions to compel concerning defendants’ responses to plaintiff’s first set of requests for production of documents and/or defendants’ responses to plaintiff’s second set of requests for production of documents in accordance with the terms identified in the order. On November 3, 2023, the court stayed the deadlines for the filing of any motion to compel so that the court could conduct an in camera review requested by the parties. As that review is complete, the court will reestablish the deadline for the filing of any motion to compel concerning the discovery responses identified above. The parties are referred to the court’s February 28, 2023, order as to the contents of the motion to compel, an opposition, and a reply.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.