Cooley

Cooley v. Servicemaster Co. LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20252:20-cv-01382California1,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRON COOLEY, No. 2:20-cv-01382-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE

SUPPELEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND

SERVICEMASTER COMPANY, LLC, et REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE al., SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Defendants. 16 On November 13, 2024, the court directed the parties to file a joint status report regarding their proposals for how this case should proceed on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Doc. No. 47.) On November 27, 2024, the parties timely filed a joint status report as directed. (Doc. No. 48.) Therein, the parties agree the sole claim remaining in this action is Plaintiff’s representative claim under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) and this court does not have original jurisdiction over that claim. (Doc. No. 48 at 2, 6– 7.) The parties further agree, correctly, that the only basis for this court to exercise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.