Jones

(PC) Garland v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20252:22-cv-01494California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, No. 2:22-cv-01494-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GENA JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (FAC). ECF No. 30; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. Local Rule 230(l). “Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion.” Id. Plaintiff has failed to file any such opposition. A responding party’s failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no 27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.