Baum Vision, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAUM VISION, LLC, Case No. 8:24-cv-01931-JWH-JDE
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. REGARDING FAILURE TO FILE
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURES
OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff Baum Vision, LLC filed the instant case against Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company in September 2024. Baum Vision asserts that the Court has diversity jurisdiction.2 As an initial matter in every case, the Court must ensure that it possesses subject matter jurisdiction. District courts “have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between . . . citizens of different states[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The party invoking the Court’s jurisdiction bears “the burden of demonstrating that the court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear an action.” Nguyen v. Cache Creek Casino Resort, 2021 WL 22434, at *2 (E.D. Cal. 11…