Robinson

Robinson v. Anjum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20252:24-cv-00756California1,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ROBINSON, No. 2:24-cv-00756 DJC AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER and NADEEM AKHTAR ANJUM and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SHAZIA ANJUM,

15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 8. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(19). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s motion be DENIED. The court also ORDERS defendant Shazia Anjum to enter an appearance in this case by January 31, 2025. I. Background Plaintiff’s complaint was filed on March 12, 2024. ECF No. 1. In the complaint, plaintiff David Robinson filed alleges defendant Nadeem Akhtar Anjum and defendant Shazia Anjum (collectively “defendants”), are the owners of the real property located at 720 Florida Street in Vallejo, California (“Property”) where the business Solano Tires and Wheels operates (“Business” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.