Samran
Samran v. Manulife Investment Mgt. Farmland Mgt. Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INDERJIT SAMRAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01042-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING RULE 37 EXPENSES MANULIFE INVESTMENT (ECF Nos. 22, 25)
MANAGEMENT FARMLAND
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. 17 On November 26, 2024, the Court granted Defendant Manulife Investment Management Farmland Management Services, Inc.’s motions to compel Plaintiff Inderjit Samran to make his initial disclosures and to respond to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production.1 (ECF No. 22.) In granting Defendant’s motions, the Court ordered Defendant to submit its reasonable expenses in making its motions to compel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5). Id. Defendant has now done so. (ECF No. 25.) The Court’s order also provided Plaintiff with the opportunity to respond to Defendant’s reasonable expenses (ECF No. 22 at 9, 10), and Plaintiff has filed a response (ECF No. 26). 27 This matter proceeds before…