(PS) Singh v. City of Elk Grove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAJ SINGH, Case No. 2:24-cv-2455-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF ELK GROVE, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Findings & Recommendations, ECF No. 3. Plaintiff filed objections on October 29, 2024, and they were considered by the undersigned. Obj., ECF No. 4. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the…