Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Cashcall, Inc.
135 F.4th 683
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 202523-55259California7,805 words
Opinion
Opinion
MILLER, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CONSUMER FINANCIAL No. 23-55259
PROTECTION BUREAU,
D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:15-cv-07522-
JFW-RAO
v.
CASHCALL, INC.; WS FUNDING, OPINION
LLC; DELBERT SERVICES
CORPORATION; J. PAUL
REDDAM,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 20, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed January 3, 2025
Before: John B. Owens, Ryan D. Nelson, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Miller; Concurrence by Judge R. Nelson CFPB V. CASHCALL, INC.
SUMMARY *
Seventh Amendment / Restitution Award
The panel affirmed the district court’s judgment, on remand from this court, ordering CashCall, Inc. to pay more than $134 million in legal restitution. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau brought an action alleging that CashCall had engaged in an “unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice” in violation of 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(B), by attempting to collect interest and fees to which it was not legally…